Tag Archives: Selangor


I wrote this article three months ago when water rationing in Selangor has ended. Today when I returned from UK, I was exasperated to know that water disruption will take place in Selangor- my hometown. Therefore, I decided to publish this article.

Unending water distruption

Unending water distruption


We don’t need any water expert or visionary leader to tell us that Selangor is going to consume more water in the future.

Just look at those skyscrapers in Kuala Lumpur, the opening of several new townships and the massive increase of population in Klang Valley, it’s obvious that this is a state where the pace of development has been unstoppable.

The demand for treated water would grow between 3%-4% annualy. In 2014, the daily demand for water in Selangor will reach 4,907 million litres, whereas the effective supply capacity is only 4,431 million litres. It means Selangor would face water shortage by almost 500 million litres per day and some politicians want us to believe the water rationing was due to dry spell season.


So how do we cater the future demand? The answer is by channeling the raw water from Sungai Pahang. To do that, a dam, intake and pumping station together with 44.6km tunnel have to be built. But this water has to be treated. Therefore Langat 2 treatment plant is needed. The whole project costing RM8.65 billion will lift Selangor’s total capacity to an estimated 7,338 mill litre per day- 70% more than the current capacity.

Selangor will have enough water until 2025.


However, the state government led by the ‘stingy’ Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim has previously refused to give his approval for the 15 lots of land needed for the construction of Langat 2. The reason?

‘There’s water everywhere and we even have flash floods. Selangor has enough water until 2019.’ So said the Menteri Besar.

Therefore the state government believes that other alternatives like cutting losses from non-revenue water, and exploring other water sources like rainwater, lakes, and underground water should be prioritised instead of the Pahang-Selangor water transfer.

Never mind if the project is already 80% completed. Why the state government should cares that without Langat 2 plant, the dam and a 44.8km-long pipeline would be rendered dysfunctional and possibly become the biggest white elephant project in the country.


First option, they want to use membrane technology from Canada. But this technology will only improve water quality, not increase water supply. Not only there is no necessity to improve our raw water that is already good, the technology is costly to implement. The cost of implementing the technology is about RM95mil per treatment plant, and if it is used on all 34 plants it would be around RM3bil-RM650 million short of the Langat 2 plants. Therefore, option 1- not feasible at all.

Second option, Selangor state government is planning to invest RM300 million to generate additional water of 600 million litres per day from the rivers in the state. The plan involves the collection of storm water from the Selangor River at old mines in Bestari Jaya.

However, this collection is estimated to be sufficient only for four months during the dry season when there is no supply from the Selangor River. That means, RM300 million plan is a short term solution unlike Langat 2. Option 2- feasible only for a short term period.

Third option, TS Khalid announced that water from ponds around Sungai Selangor is pumped into the river to boost its flow. The RM10 million fund has been approved to buy high-powered pumps. But how safe is the water from disused mines considering that the water has been stagnant for years?

Water from the surface may not pose problems, but if taken from the bottom of mining pools, heavy metals would be pumped as well. Does the citizen in the most developed state deserve to get water supply from disused mines? If that’s the case, why don’t they just consume water brought in by floods. It’s free though. Option 3-not only feasible, but dangerous.

Clearly, after few years of dilly-dally with the alternatives for water solution in Selangor, Langat 2 remains the most sensible solution. The truth is, the state government wants to leverage on Langat 2 plant’s approvals to take over Selangor’s water assets.


Why do they want to take over all the water companies? It is because they have promised to provide free water and no increase in water tariff to Selangorian. Under the concession agreement, water tariff will be gradually increased. Failure to honour the agreement means the state government has to compensate Syabas.

Of course, these are the populist move. Who doesn’t like free water anyway?

But good governance is not about being popular. It’s about being responsible.  That they deprived 8 million residents in Selangor from continuous water supply was a clear example how irresponsible the state government.

Because of the populist election manifesto, the Selangor Government halted any increase in water tariff, even though it was provided for under the concession agreements. Nor does it compensate the company. So without extra revenue, Syabas has no funds to carry out the Capex programmes such as replacement of pipes and other water infrastructure in the concession area.


Admittedly Selangor has the highest NRW in Malaysia. It is due to the pipes that mostly laid over 50 years ago. Therefore a huge sum of money is needed to replace about 6000 km of pipes. Assuming RM500 per meter cost of standard sized (300mm) steel pipes, the estimated replacement value is RM3 billion. Obviously the state government couldn’t afford to finance the cost.

This explains why water industry in Selangor has been privatised. It’s simply because we need money from private sector.

And the result is encouraging. In the first year of privatisation, Syabas has managed to reduce NRW by 10% from 43% to 33%. Only when the state government through Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Air Negara (SPAN) decided to freeze all NRW related works in 2008, the NRW percentage remains.

The state government knows about this. They are not stupid. But being trapped in free water promise, they couldn’t allow any tariff increases. So they decided to acquire all water companies in Selangor. After all, Syabas was found to breach several contract terms in a 2008 audit report. They supposed to conduct open tender but they have awarded RM600 million worth of contracts in direct negotiation instead. And one of the foreign company secured RM375 million pipe replacement project instead of sourcing for local pipes company as required.

Whatever, after more than five years of trying, they failed to acquire the companies on a “willing seller, willing buyer” basis.

But the underlying issue is solving water supply and acquiring water assets are two different matters and should be treated separately.

Do you put on hold the MRT project just because you wanted to nationalise our toll concessionaries?


So they play politics with water. More than 700 new development projects could not proceed due to dwindling supply reserve. 130 factories worth RM4 billion in investments and 12,300 jobs could not get approval to be set up in Selangor.

RM750 million that has been used to finance 11 mitigation projects could have been saved.

Call it political expediency or political stupidity.

The truth is the ‘stingy’ Menteri Besar should understand construction of the plant would have been much cheaper to build had it started three years ago. Langat 2 would have been operational now, providing extra 1,130mil litres daily and avoiding the crisis today. And of course this article wouldn’t be needed.


It’s good to be back. Selamat Berpuasa Semua! 🙂

Tagged , , , ,

Kajang Move: Debunking The Strategist

Now we know that the reason of Anwar Ibrahim contesting in Kajang by-election is to fortify Selangor. According to Rafizi Ramli, the Kajang Move is to fend off any political attacks and manouvres from UMNO. The ever brilliant strategist further claimed the Prime Minister will be removed from UMNO.

It is worth mentioning that Tun Abdullah was forced to retire during the 2008 UMNO party election. Even the move to replace Tun Dr Mahathir as a president of UMNO 15 years ago was done through the same channel. And in case someone may forgot, the UMNO party election was held last year. Now Mr Rafizi, how do you explain this- if ‘the ultras led by Tun Dr Mahathir’ had wanted to take Najib down, why do hey return him as their president unopposed? Too much thinking of conspiracies  I think.

By saying that Anwar Ibrahim has to be (and lead) in Selangor on the basis that the state become the launchpad for Putrajaya, the strategist is also implying not Khalid Ibrahim, not Azmin Ali, not anyone else amongst Pakatan’s DUN members and certainly not even himself can ensure potholes in Selangor got filled up.

It is obvious the Kajang Move showcase the lack of talent and trust within Pakatan Rakyat where there is no one else except Anwar Ibrahim who can provide radical approach  in dealing with the water fiasco, Allah/Jais issue and public housing problem.

Not only Pakatan is short of talent, they are also so short of vision. Within 7 months after the election, suddenly they change their mind on who should lead the state. Does this mean similarly if they are the federal government, they will consider such move just to neutralise infighting? In other words, as long as there are people who sulk, Anwar Ibrahim has to pacify them by holding both PM and MB post. If this is the case, when the world-class leader will actually govern? So much of Pakatan Harapan Rakyat.

The argument lay by the strategist that they had to act early for the fear of repeating Kedah experience is superficial. PAS-led government in Kedah is different. It is true there was infighting but also the MB was sick hence he was not performing well. In Selangor, the strategist himself said Khalid Ibrahim has set the gold standard for his administration. So why the need to replace him? Especially with someone who is tainted, morally corrupted and most importantly has failed the whole nation during his tenure as Minister of Finance.

Actually, what the strategist failed to tell us is that his boss- notwithstanding his political prowess, has never been known for his administration skills. This can be seen by looking on his incapability to solve the feud between Khalid Ibrahim and Azmin Ali. What more, he was never an effective economic advisor. So Mr Strategist, is this your deal to Selangorians by offering the worse administrator to lead the state?

In case you may say this is the only option, please remember infighting for the top job is normal in politics. Barisan Nasional also faced the same problem in the past. But how do they react? They rotate the CM post among ethnic parties in Sabah in order to pacify all the component parties. In short, they share the political power. This is the greatest master stroke that you, Mr Strategist have to learn from your enemy.

To re-quote from you (pun intended), I hope that one day when you are still not in Putrajaya, you can look back to the “Kajang Move” as the game over in your quest for Putrajaya. I honestly hope that it will be your defining moments that disallow you from being one step closer to Putrajaya.


Tagged , , , ,